This article aims to find out how human intelligence and artificial intelligence can complement each other better through the comparison of art and technology. Here is an example of artificial intelligence visual art research. The method is: First of all, from the characteristics of artistic language, explore the charm of human intelligence. Furthermore, from the characteristics of technical language, we can feel the power of artificial intelligence. Finally, from the characteristics of human-computer interaction and typical examples, we can explore how humanities and engineering complements each other. In this paper, we discuss the creativity, artistic standards and artificial reception issues in artificial intelligence art through analyzing the latest artificial intelligence art programs such as “Creative Adversarial Networks” (CAN) and Google Deep Dream. We argue that creativity is not only novelty, such as “style ambiguity” and other techniques, but also originality. The result is the discovery of that the art standard cannot be limited to be searched in previous works of art. The art standard itself is historical and changeable, and is the “true content”. Both Creativity and art standard need us comprehend and rethink about the overall laws and paradigms of whole art. However, from the perspective of art reception, the artificial intelligence art has its own unique value. Its significance lies in: it has opened up a vast new world for the intelligence art education. Further, we can also compare the thinking habits of artists and scientists and engineering technologists respectively from the linguistic cognition. Next, we will study that the cooperative research topic of digital and textual chessboard combined with human-computer will not only help teachers and students in the art education process build their own personalized knowledge bases. It would be a better understanding of the benefits of combining human brain and computer.